SafePorter aggregates free-text responses into group insights. Organizations can understand what people describe in their own words without receiving the individual comments. Results are withheld when too few people contribute, and detail that could identify a person is suppressed.
Free-text questions are available in feedback surveys. They are not used in demographic surveys.
A person can describe themselves without giving their name. A rare role, a precise sequence of events or a recognizable project can reveal who wrote a comment to someone familiar with the organization.
Changing the wording does not necessarily remove that clue. A summary can preserve the identifying fact even when it removes every direct quotation.
This is why SafePorter's reporting protection covers the specificity of an insight as well as the number of people behind it.
Illustrative example, not a customer response or product screenshot.
Several written responses might describe delays caused by repeated approvals. One might also mention a unique client project and the date of a particular meeting.
The organization needs to understand the recurring approval problem. It does not need the identifying project and meeting details to decide whether to review its process.
A protected insight could describe the approval delays only where the underlying responses support it and the disclosure controls permit it. SafePorter must withhold information that cannot be reported safely.
The organization receives group insights rather than source comments. It cannot open a person's written response in its dashboard.
The privacy rule applies to the complete result. A large respondent population does not excuse a detail that singles someone out, and a useful insight does not justify exposing the person who supplied the information.
A theme is not automatically a prevalence measure. Without a defined question and appropriate supporting data, the fact that an issue appears in written feedback does not establish what proportion of the whole workforce experiences it.
Nor does the absence of a theme establish that nobody raised it. Some information cannot be reported because too few people support it or because it remains identifying.
Those limits matter when a rare concern is serious. Protected group reporting belongs alongside a route for individual concerns that need confidential investigation or direct help.
Ask about the work, process or experience you need to understand. Avoid asking respondents to supply names or unnecessary personal details. Explain that their words contribute to group insights and that the employer will not receive their individual comment.
Read the explanation for respondents or see employee-feedback uses.
---
Bring the question your organization needs answered.
Request a demonstration